Does the Canadian Judicial System Employ Wigs- An Insight into Courtroom Tradition
Do they wear wigs in Canadian court? This question often arises among those unfamiliar with the legal system in Canada. The answer, while not straightforward, provides insight into the country’s legal traditions and the evolution of courtroom attire over time.
The tradition of wearing wigs in Canadian courts has its roots in British legal customs. When Canada was a British colony, judges and lawyers followed the British practice of wearing wigs and robes as a symbol of their professionalism and authority. This attire was meant to convey a sense of formality and seriousness, ensuring that legal proceedings were conducted with the utmost respect.
However, as Canada gained independence and its legal system evolved, the use of wigs began to decline. In 1970, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that wigs were no longer mandatory for judges or lawyers. This decision was based on the principle that courtroom attire should be practical and comfortable, rather than a relic of the past.
Today, while wigs are no longer required, some judges and lawyers in Canada still choose to wear them. This is largely a personal preference, as there is no official rule dictating their use. Some argue that wigs help maintain the traditional appearance of the legal profession, while others believe that they are unnecessary and outdated.
The decline of the wig tradition in Canadian courts reflects a broader shift towards a more inclusive and accessible legal system. This shift is evident in other aspects of courtroom attire as well. For example, judges and lawyers are now more likely to wear business casual or business professional attire, rather than the formal robes and wigs of the past.
In conclusion, while the practice of wearing wigs in Canadian courts is no longer mandatory, it remains a personal choice for some judges and lawyers. The evolution of courtroom attire in Canada highlights the country’s commitment to modernizing its legal system while still respecting its rich legal heritage.